Cooperation Plan
Crawford Nickel Project
Document Reference Number: 94
March 31, 2023
Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Project description
- 3. Approach to cooperation
- 4. Gathering and review of proponent information
- 5. Timelines and time management
- 6. Sharing of information
- 7. Public participation
- 8. Indigenous consultation and engagement
- 9. Decision statement
- 10. Interpretation
- 11. Contact information
- Appendix 1
- Appendix 2
1. Introduction
On January 5, 2023, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) announced that an impact assessment is required for the Crawford Nickel Project (the Project), pursuant to subsection 16(1) of Canada's Impact Assessment Act.
Aspects of the Project are also subject to various class environmental assessments (Class EAs) pursuant to Ontario's Environmental Assessment Act, and to various provincial permitting and approval requirements that include an assessment of environmental effects.
This Plan was developed by the Agency with input from Ontario ministries and relevant organizationsFootnote 1 to set out intentions and plans for a cooperative assessment process for the Project. The provincial ministries and organizations participating in the impact assessment are included in the Appendix and are herein referred to as "participating ministries".
This Plan is intended to be flexible and does not preclude the Agency and participating ministries from modifying the cooperative approach described in this Plan in order to accommodate changes that may occur during the assessment process.
2. Project description
Canada Nickel Company (the proponent) is proposing the construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of an open-pit nickel-cobalt mine and on-site metal mill, located 43 kilometres north of Timmins, Ontario. As proposed, the Project would have a mine ore production capacity of 275,000 tonnes per day and a mill ore input capacity of 120,000 tonnes per day. The Project would operate for about 43 years.
The Project includes a mine site with mining infrastructure, relocation of provincial Highway 655 and an existing 500 kilovolt transmission line, a new 20 kilometre rail spur, and one or more effluent discharge pipes.
For more information on the impact assessment of the Crawford Nickel Project or to view the information and comments received, visit the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry (the Public Registry) at https://www.iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/83857.
3. Approach to cooperation
Through cooperation, the Agency and participating ministries will strive to increase efficiency and certainty for all participants, including the proponent, the public, and Indigenous communities, by sharing information and expertise, coordinating activities, and harmonizing timelines where possible.
The following table outlines potential opportunities for cooperation, subject to proponent timelines for planning and design decisions, and sequencing of approvals.
Project Activity |
Responsible Entity |
Regulatory MechanismFootnote 2 |
Potential Opportunities for Cooperation |
---|---|---|---|
Highway 655 relocation |
The proponent |
Class EA for Provincial Transportation Facilities |
|
500 kilovolt transmission line relocation |
Hydro One Networks Incorporated |
Class EA for Minor Transmission Facilities |
Information sharing Coordinated technical reports, government review, comment period |
Resource stewardship and facility development projects |
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry |
Class EA for Resource Stewardship and Facility Development Projects |
|
Crown lease for mining |
Ontario Ministry of Mines |
Class EA for Activities of Ministry of Mines |
Information sharing |
Emissions, resource use, and other activities |
|
Examples:
|
|
Transportation routes |
Ontario Ministry of Transportation, |
|
Information sharing |
Mine closure and rehabilitation |
Ontario Ministry of Mines |
Mine Closure Plan |
Information sharing |
4. Gathering and review of proponent information
The following table identifies the factors to be considered by both the Agency and participating ministries where there exist opportunities for cooperation to facilitate the exchange of information and expert advice and reduce duplication.
Common Factors related to the Assessment |
Common Areas of Federal-Provincial Review |
---|---|
Changes to the natural and physical environment |
|
Changes to health, social and economic conditions |
|
Impacts on Indigenous peoples and the exercise of rights |
|
Other effects |
Effects of the environment on the Project, including climate change resiliency |
The Agency has prepared Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines that set out the information required of the proponent in the Impact Statement. General information requirements for the provincial Class EAs and provincial permitting and approvals are available at https://www.ontario.ca/page/environment-and-energy (see Table 1 of this document).
The Agency and participating ministries may participate in technical working groups with the proponent, Indigenous communities, federal expert departments, and community groups, as appropriate.
5. Timelines and time management
The Agency and participating ministries have agreed to undertake their respective assessment processes in a cooperative manner such that government review and comment period on the Impact Statement and any Environmental Study Reports for Class EAs are coordinated, where possible.
Participating ministries are also invited to align government review and engagement on permits and approvals with the Agency's comment period on the draft Impact Assessment Report and potential conditions, where suitable.
This Plan recognizes that the alignment of respective timelines is subject to the legislative obligations prescribed in the Impact Assessment Act and relevant provincial legislation, as well as the completeness of any information submitted by the proponent.
The Agency will provide the participating ministries listed in Table A1 in the Appendix with advanced notices of opportunities for cooperation. The Agency will also ensure that timely and effective communication occurs throughout the impact assessment process.
6. Sharing of information
The Agency and participating ministries will share, as appropriate, the following information obtained during the assessment of the Project on matters identified in Table 2:
- expert advice received;
- existing studies and information;
- comments received through engagement and consultation;
- information received from the proponent (e.g. technical submissions, responses to deficiency reports); and
- provincial regulatory, policy or other instruments and measures that could manage potential adverse effects of the Project (i.e. complementary measures), and regulatory decision criteria.
The Agency and participating ministries will respect requirements related to privacy and protection, including protection of Indigenous knowledge, when sharing or publicly posting information.
7. Public participation
The Agency and participating ministries plan to have a coordinated comment period on the proponent's Impact Statement and any Environmental Study Reports for Class EAs, if possible.
For further information on public participation and engagement activities, please see the Project's Public Participation Plan.
8. Indigenous consultation and engagement
The Agency will lead Crown Consultation on behalf of the Government of Canada for this federal impact assessment, while the proponent and participating ministries will be responsible for Crown consultation for provincial decisions.
For further information on the Agency's Indigenous Consultation and Engagement activities, please see the Project's Indigenous Engagement and Partnership Plan.
9. Decision statement
The Agency will consult with participating ministries regarding proposed conditions related to decisions and any relevant complementary measures, to facilitate consistency and improve regulatory efficiencies.
10. Interpretation
This Plan is not a legal document and does not change any existing federal, provincial, or municipal legislative or regulatory jurisdiction, right, power, privilege, prerogative or immunity by virtue, nor does it create any new legal powers, duties or legally binding obligations.
11. Contact information
The Agency office designated for administering the impact assessment of the Project is:
Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, Ontario Regional Office
Email: Crawford@iaac-aeic.gc.ca
Appendix 1
Provincial Ministry |
Relevant Areas of Expertise |
Contact Information |
---|---|---|
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks |
Air quality, noise impacts, groundwater and surface water, drinking water sources, fish consumption, species at risk, environmental spills (land and surface water), alternatives assessment, acid rock drainage/metal leaching, mine waste management, Aboriginal and treaty rights |
Environmental Approvals Branch Greg Ault, Manager |
Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism |
Cultural heritage resources which includes archaeological resources, built heritage resources, and cultural heritage landscapes |
Karla Barboza, Team Lead - Heritage Joseph Harvey, Heritage Planner |
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport |
Tourism, including resource-based tourism |
James Antler, Policy Advisor |
Ministry of Mines |
Land restoration and progressive rehabilitation, mine feasibility, job stimulation, sustainable development, of critical minerals |
Michael Young, Mineral Exploration & Development Consultant |
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry |
Outdoor recreation and resource use, impacts on fishing, outdoor recreation and tourism, hunting, trapping, forestry, wildlife, provincially significant wetlands |
Cory Wiseman, District Supervisor |
Ministry of Transportation |
Transportation planning and infrastructure, road safety, cycling, walking, vehicles |
Andrew Healy, Head, Environmental Laurel Muldoon, Corridor Management Senior Project Manager (Acting) |
Hydro One Networks Incorporated |
Owns and operates provincial electrical transmission infrastructure in the Timmins region |
Kimberly Miller-Bautista, Environmental Planner |
Ontario Northland Transportation Commission |
Operates rail freight and passenger services in northern Ontario |
Paul André Lajeunesse, Director Rail Infrastructure |
Appendix 2
Regulatory Mechanism |
Reference |
---|---|
Class EA for Provincial Transportation Facilities |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/class-ea-provincial-transportation-facilities |
Class EA for Minor Transmission Facilities |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/class-ea-minor-transmission-facilities |
Class EA for Resource Stewardship and Facility Development Projects |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/class-ea-resource-stewardship-and-facility-development-projects |
Class EA for Activities of the Ministry of Mines under the Mining Act |
|
Environmental Compliance Approval for Air, Noise and Sewage works under the Environmental Protection Act and Ontario Water Resources Act |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/environmental-compliance-approval |
Overall Benefit Permit for species at risk under the Endangered Species Act |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/species-risk-overall-benefit-permits |
Permit to Take Water under the Ontario Water Resources Act |
|
Crown land dispositions under the Public Lands Act |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/application-review-and-land-disposition-process-policy |
Work permits for construction of facilities on Crown land under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act and Public Lands Act |
|
Approvals for dams and other works under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act |
https://www.ontario.ca/page/lakes-and-rivers-improvement-act-administrative-guide |
Mine Closure Plan under the Mining Act |